Bap33
|
Festus, You are correct, but to be honest, my lol was more about folks unwilling to change their cars to meet a set of rules ... then suggesting that other folks change their cars to meet a set of rules .... and I figured the poster was kidding, since those two points made by him contradict so obviously - that they had to be made in jest.
One could look at these current track specific rules this way: These rules reflect the IMCA mod class after it had been "adjusted" over a 10 to 15 year span .. lets say circa 2001 or so ... and by that time the "cat was out of the bag", so to speak, and was getting expensive. THe better traction was allowing/requiring for more power and better parts for engines and trannys to live. So, maybe, what I am suggesting is for this move to a less expensive class be taken advantage of, and the traction, power, and expense of operation, be taken back to the place were the class was most accessible to more racers accross the board.
Sanctioned by IMCA is the better way for the racers to enjoy their hobby, and that "should" make it better for everyone - fans, tracks, sponsors, wives, today's racers, and tomorrow's racers.
But, the central valley economy is really, really, bad. Really bad. Only wealthy racers don't feel or see it. And the demographic that does this hobby is shrinking as a percentage of California. And disposable income is at an all-time low ... like, 1929-31 low ... but, midgets were still racing all over at that time, so maybe the right kind of racing will gain the market share and carry us through?
|